AI and education

Tak Auyeung

Creative Commons License
The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Attendnace

Attendance QR Code

LLM

  • Large Language Model
  • Language-based mimic
  • Capable of abstraction
    • Recognize and apply learned patterns
  • Incapable of “hard logic”
  • Garbage-in-garbage-out

Intrinsic limitations of LLM

  • Linguistic-only.
  • Do we think in words?
  • Is creativity linguistic-only?

Q-Star

  • New development from OpenAI
  • The exact nature is not known
  • Speculations:
    • A-Star, combined with
    • Q learning
  • Should resolve some “hard logic” limitations

The point is…

  • Development is fast
  • Lots of active research both in academia and corporate world
  • Moore’s Law is still alive, but aged
  • AI will be more capable and accessible, period

Here we are

  • What do our students need?
  • How does AI integrate into what we do?
  • What is our (human) value in education?

Challenges

  • Students using AI to do their homework
  • Can AI replace us?
  • Can we use AI to enhance teaching?
  • What matters in the end?

What matters in the end?

  • Are our students hirable?
  • Are our students responsible members of society?
  • Are our students “educated”?

Will you hire our students?

  • What do you expect them to accomplish at work?
  • Is AI a useful tool you expect employees to use?
    • If so, which part of a job still needs human intervention?
  • How is AI utilized in the job?

What does Sir Christopher Pissarides have to say?

Sir Pissarides
  • IT jobs sow their “own seeds of self-destruction.”
  • Some skills are less “replaceable by AI”:
    • Managerial
    • Creative
    • Empathetic
    • Really?

I’m sorry, Sir Pissarides

  • Yeah, not really!
  • AI can:
    • distinguish human facial expressions better than an average person,
    • generate images, music, writing, etc. in specific styles,
    • “understand” rules, apply rules in situations, and do so while sounding empathetic.

Let’s try this again

  • A LLM relies on massive training samples.
  • If something is not well documented/discussed, a LLM cannot learn it.
  • A LLM has no sensory input/association.
  • A LLM does not understand hard logic.

What can (some) humans (still) do better?

  • Critical thinking (application of hard logic).
  • On-the-spot problem-solving (no prior examples, plus the application of hard logic).
  • Abstraction, theorization. The recognition of systematic or cross-domain conceptual (as opposed to linguistic) pattern.
  • Learning using few examples, or just the explanation of rules.

Curricula and SLOs

  • What do we focus on?
  • What to teach?
  • How to assess?
  • Bloom’s Taxonomy (from 1956!).

Bloom’s Knowledge

  • still important, where to find information
  • authority of the source of information
  • reliability of the source of information
  • not so much the memorization of information

Bloom’s Comprehension

  • the relationship of pieces of knowledge
  • if definitions, terms, etc. are nodes, comprehension is the mesh connecting the nodes

Bloom’s Application

  • Was Benjamin Bloom right to put application between “comprehension” and “analysis”?
  • Is “application” the same as “problem-solving”?

Bloom’s Analysis

  • Given a problem/scenario and solution description, break it up and relate to concepts, definitions.
  • Applicable to a problem/scenario description.
  • Also, applicable to the qualification of a solution.
  • Mapping a problem/scenario and solution description as instances onto the mesh of knowledge and comprehension
  • The first step of problem-solving.

Bloom’s Synthesis

  • Given the results of analysis, the derivation of actions/steps to achieve a target scenario.
  • Think of the problem description as an initial state as a super-imposed mesh over the knowledge-comprehension mesh.
  • Each action morphs this super-imposed mesh.
  • How to morph the super-imposed mesh to match the final state, a solution as a super-imposed mesh?
  • There may be multiple ways to achieve a target scenario.

Bloom’s Evaluation

  • Compare and contrast the various ways generated in synthesis.
  • Apply criteria and requirements that are applicable to compare alternatives.
  • Also, a way to evaluate scenarios.

Designing assessment activities

  • To deter/detect the use of AI tools

Contextualize questions

  • Based on what we discuss in class…
  • After watching this video on YouTube,…
  • Describe your personal experience and relate it to…

In-person assessment

  • In-person
  • On-paper
  • No electronics!

Google Doc

  • Use edit tracking
  • A human edit history should be obvious
  • Ask Tak for ideas to use a script to measure metrics!
  • Will need editor access
    • Generate instructor owned document and share with students